UK guidance for managing water quality, Legionella risk, and public safety in decorative water features.
PWTAG Technical Note 67 (TN67) provides the definitive UK guidance on the safe management of decorative water features such as fountains, cascades, water walls, and ground-based jets. Combined with BS 8580-1:2019 for Legionella risk assessment, it defines strict water chemistry targets, physical inspection requirements, and management record protocols. This guide covers the complete inspection methodology, the chemical compliance parameters, the Legionella risk framework, and how to digitize the entire water feature inspection workflow with Geocadra.

What is PWTAG TN67?
PWTAG Technical Note 67 is the UK guidance for managing water quality and Legionella risk in decorative water features. It mandates chlorine levels of 3-5 mg/L, pH 7.0-7.4, monthly bacteriological testing, and BS 8580-aligned risk assessments for fountains, cascades, and ground-based jets.
- Full Name
- Technical Note 67: Decorative Water Features
- Issuing Body
- Pool Water Treatment Advisory Group (PWTAG)
- Current Revision
- TN67 (current edition)
How PWTAG TN67 Water Feature Inspections Work
PWTAG TN67 addresses a critical public health gap: decorative water features in public spaces are often treated as purely aesthetic installations, yet they present significant microbiological risks. Water features that generate aerosols through spray, jets, or cascading flow can transmit Legionella pneumophila and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to anyone within the spray zone. Children frequently paddle in open-access fountains, and ground-based jets in dry plaza installations invite direct body contact. TN67 recognises that these features require water treatment standards comparable to swimming pools despite being classified as non-interactive.
The inspection methodology combines two complementary frameworks. PWTAG TN67 provides the water chemistry targets and operational requirements specific to decorative water features, including the elevated chlorine range of 3-5 mg/L (higher than the 1-3 mg/L range for swimming pools) justified by the intermittent circulation and higher contamination risk inherent in outdoor features. BS 8580-1:2019 provides the Legionella risk assessment framework that evaluates the physical condition of the asset, the presence of biofilm and sediment as nutrient sources for bacterial colonisation, the aerosol generation potential, and the temperature profile of the water system.
The inspection workflow follows a structured five-stage process: first, the inspector classifies the feature type and its inherent risk profile based on public access level and aerosol generation potential. Second, water chemistry measurements are taken immediately upon arrival, before any physical disturbance of the water body. Third, the basin, jets, and surrounding structure are visually inspected for biofilm, sediment, algae, and structural defects. Fourth, the plant room equipment is checked including circulation pumps, chemical dosing systems, UV treatment, and filtration. Finally, management records are audited to verify that bacteriological testing, Legionella monitoring, and risk assessments are current.
The guidance is published by the Pool Water Treatment Advisory Group (PWTAG) and serves as the primary reference for water treatment in public swimming pools and water features across the United Kingdom.
PWTAG TN67 Water Chemistry Compliance Targets
TN67 mandates strict chemical parameters that exceed swimming pool standards due to the higher contamination risk in outdoor water features.
The cornerstone of PWTAG TN67 compliance is maintaining water chemistry within defined safe limits. The standard mandates a free chlorine residual of 3.0-5.0 mg/L for chlorine-sanitised features, significantly higher than the 1.0-3.0 mg/L range required for swimming pools. This elevated range compensates for the higher organic loading from environmental contamination (leaves, bird droppings, dust, litter) and the intermittent operation schedules common in decorative features. The pH target of 7.0-7.4 is tighter than many pool standards and reflects the need to maintain chlorine in its most effective form as hypochlorous acid.
For features using bromine as the primary sanitiser, the target total bromine concentration is 4.0-6.0 mg/L, with a corresponding pH range of 7.4-8.2 that reflects the different dissociation curve of hypobromous acid. The inspector measures free chlorine, total chlorine, and pH using a DPD (diethyl-p-phenylenediamine) test kit or electronic photometer. Combined chlorine, calculated as the difference between total and free chlorine, should not exceed half the free chlorine reading. Elevated combined chlorine indicates the formation of chloramines, which reduce disinfection effectiveness and can cause respiratory irritation in the spray zone.
Water clarity is a critical pass/fail parameter under TN67. If the water is cloudy or opaque to the point where the basin bottom is not visible, the feature must be drained and closed to the public until clarity is restored. This is not merely aesthetic, as turbid water prevents visual detection of hazards, indicates inadequate filtration, and correlates with elevated bacterial counts. Water temperature is recorded because temperatures above 20 degrees Celsius create conditions favourable to Legionella proliferation, requiring enhanced monitoring and potentially more aggressive chemical treatment.
| Parameter | Target Range | Action Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Free Chlorine | 3.0 - 5.0 mg/L | Below 3.0 mg/L: increase dosing. Above 5.0 mg/L: reduce dosing, check controller. |
| Total Bromine (if used) | 4.0 - 6.0 mg/L | Below 4.0 mg/L: increase dosing. Above 6.0 mg/L: reduce dosing. |
| pH Level (Chlorine) | 7.0 - 7.4 | Outside range: adjust acid/alkali dosing. Below 7.0: corrosion risk. |
| pH Level (Bromine) | 7.4 - 8.2 | Outside range: adjust dosing. Above 8.2: reduced biocidal effectiveness. |
| Water Clarity | Clear (bottom visible) | Turbid/opaque: drain and close feature. Investigate filtration. |
| Water Temperature | Monitor (record value) | Above 20 C: increased Legionella risk. Enhanced monitoring required. |
| Combined Chlorine | < 50% of Free Chlorine | Elevated: indicates chloramine formation. Increase turnover or partial drain. |
Targets are per PWTAG TN67 guidance. Features using drain-and-fill only (no continuous sanitisation) require more frequent complete water changes.
For related water quality management standards in drainage systems, see the CIRIA C753 SuDS inspection standard.
Try this PWTAG TN67 form in Geocadra
We have a pre-built PWTAG TN67 inspection template ready to go. Sign up and start your first condition assessment today.
Free 14-day trial. No credit card required.
Legionella Risk Assessment Under BS 8580
Water features are classified as high-risk sources for Legionella due to aerosol generation. BS 8580 provides the risk assessment framework integrated into TN67 inspections.
Legionella pneumophila, the bacterium responsible for Legionnaires' disease, thrives in warm stagnant water between 20 and 45 degrees Celsius and is transmitted through inhalation of contaminated aerosol droplets. Decorative water features present an ideal transmission route because they combine warm recirculated water with active aerosol generation from jets, sprays, and cascading flow. BS 8580-1:2019 (Water Quality - Risk Assessments for Legionella Control) provides the risk assessment methodology that PWTAG TN67 references for evaluating and managing this hazard.
The risk assessment evaluates four interconnected factors. First, aerosol generation potential is classified from High (spray and mist from jets) through Medium (splashing) and Low (laminar flow) to None (still water). Features with High aerosol risk require the most stringent chemical treatment and monitoring regimes. Second, the physical condition of the asset is assessed for biofilm, which provides the protective matrix within which Legionella colonies establish and resist chemical treatment. Widespread biofilm is a critical failure condition that requires immediate shutdown and deep cleaning. Third, sediment and organic debris are evaluated as nutrient sources that support bacterial growth. Heavy sludge accumulation in a basin or balance tank indicates inadequate maintenance and significantly elevates the Legionella risk profile.
Fourth, the management framework is audited to verify that Legionella testing is performed at least monthly, that results are recorded and trended, and that a current risk assessment (less than two years old) exists for the installation. The BS 8580 risk assessment status in the inspection form captures whether the risk assessment is current, expired, or non-existent. A missing or expired risk assessment is itself a non-conformance that must be flagged regardless of the water quality findings. The last Legionella test result is recorded with four outcome levels: Not Detected, Detected below 1000 cfu/L, Detected above 1000 cfu/L, or Unknown. Any detection above 1000 cfu/L triggers immediate corrective action including thermal or chemical shock treatment, system review, and re-sampling.
| Risk Level | Mechanism | Example Feature Types | Monitoring Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | Spray / Mist | Ground-based jets, spray fountains, misting systems | Maximum disinfection. Monthly Legionella testing. Full BS 8580 risk assessment. |
| Medium | Splashing | Traditional fountain with jets, cascades with impact zones | Standard TN67 disinfection. Monthly bacteriological testing. |
| Low | Laminar flow | Water walls, laminar jet displays | Standard TN67 disinfection. Quarterly bacteriological testing acceptable. |
| None | Still water | Reflecting ponds, ornamental pools without jets | Reduced monitoring acceptable. Algae and aesthetic maintenance primary concern. |
Risk classification determines monitoring frequency and disinfection intensity per BS 8580-1:2019.
The full BS 8580 methodology is available through the British Standards Institution (BSI).
Physical Condition and Plant Equipment Assessment
The physical inspection covers the basin structure, surrounding surfaces, biological contamination indicators, and the full plant room equipment chain.
The physical inspection component of a PWTAG TN67 assessment evaluates the water feature asset from two perspectives: the visible condition of the basin and its surroundings, and the operational status of the treatment plant equipment. The basin inspection uses a structured assessment aligned with BS 8580 condition categories. General cleanliness is classified as Satisfactory or Unsatisfactory. Biofilm and slime presence is graded on a three-point scale: None Visible, Minor Localised Slime, or Widespread Biofilm. The distinction between minor and widespread is operationally critical because widespread biofilm indicates systemic failure of the disinfection regime and requires shutdown for deep cleaning, while minor localised slime can typically be addressed through targeted removal and chemical adjustment.
Sediment and debris accumulation is classified into four categories: None, Organic Debris (leaves and litter), Scale and Staining, or Heavy Sludge. Each category has different remediation requirements. Organic debris requires removal and review of site management practices. Scale and staining indicate water chemistry imbalances, particularly elevated calcium hardness or pH. Heavy sludge is a critical finding that requires drain-down, mechanical cleaning, and investigation of filtration effectiveness. Algae growth is assessed across four types: None, Green Algae, Black Algae, or Mustard Algae. Black algae is particularly concerning as it develops deep root structures that resist surface treatment and requires aggressive intervention including acid washing.
The plant room inspection covers the full treatment chain. Circulation status is recorded as Running, Off (Scheduled), Off (Fault), or Reduced Flow. TN67 recommends 24-hour continuous circulation for features with public access, and any unscheduled stoppage increases contamination risk. Pump strainers are checked for blockage or damage. Chemical dosing lines are inspected for leaks, crystallisation, and air locks, all of which compromise disinfection delivery. The UV system status is recorded as Operational, Fault Light On, Bulb Replacement Due, or Not Applicable. TN67 specifies a minimum UV dose capability of 40 mJ per square centimetre for effective secondary disinfection against Cryptosporidium, which is resistant to chlorine treatment.
For similar structural condition assessment methods in infrastructure assets, see the EN 13508-2 sewer inspection standard. Browse all available inspection standards in the standards directory.
Management Records and Compliance Audit
TN67 and BS 8580 require operators to maintain documented evidence of ongoing water quality management, testing, and risk assessment.
The final stage of a PWTAG TN67 inspection audits the site management records to verify that the operator is maintaining the required documentation and testing regime. The logbook availability check confirms that a current operational logbook exists on site, recording daily water chemistry readings, chemical dosing adjustments, equipment maintenance, and any incidents or complaints. The absence of a logbook is a significant non-conformance that suggests reactive rather than proactive water management.
Bacteriological testing frequency is verified by recording the date of the last bacteriological test. TN67 recommends monthly testing for features with public access and aerosol generation potential. The test panel typically includes Legionella pneumophila, E. coli (as a faecal indicator organism), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (an opportunistic pathogen that thrives in warm water and biofilm), and Total Viable Count (TVC) as a general indicator of microbial load. The inspection form captures sample details including a unique Sample ID, the sample location (Basin, Jets, Balance Tank, or Make-up Water), and the specific tests requested for each sample.
The risk assessment status is classified as Current (less than two years old), Expired, or None Available. BS 8580 requires risk assessments to be reviewed at least biennially and updated whenever significant changes occur to the installation, the water source, the operating regime, or following any Legionella detection event. An expired or missing risk assessment represents a failure of the management system regardless of the current water quality results. Defects identified during the inspection are logged with a description, a category (Hygiene, Mechanical, Chemical, Structural, or Health and Safety), a priority level (Immediate/Safety Critical, High, Medium, or Low), and mandatory photographic evidence.
For further guidance on Legionella control requirements, refer to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Legionella guidance.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is PWTAG TN67?
PWTAG Technical Note 67 is the UK guidance document for managing water quality and safety in decorative water features such as fountains, cascades, water walls, and ground-based jets. Published by the Pool Water Treatment Advisory Group, it defines chemical treatment targets, inspection requirements, and operational management standards to prevent waterborne infections.
Why is the chlorine level higher in water features than swimming pools?
PWTAG TN67 mandates 3-5 mg/L free chlorine for water features versus 1-3 mg/L for swimming pools. The higher range compensates for greater environmental contamination from bird droppings, leaves, and dust in outdoor installations, plus the intermittent circulation schedules common in decorative features that allow contaminant accumulation.
How does Legionella risk apply to decorative water features?
Water features that generate aerosols through jets, sprays, or cascading flow can transmit Legionella bacteria via inhaled water droplets. BS 8580 risk assessments evaluate aerosol generation potential, water temperature, biofilm presence, and management practices to determine the risk level and required monitoring frequency.
How often should PWTAG TN67 inspections be performed?
Daily water chemistry checks (chlorine and pH) should be performed by the operator. Monthly bacteriological testing including Legionella sampling is recommended for features with public access. Full condition and compliance inspections following the TN67 framework should be conducted at least quarterly or after any incident.
Is PWTAG TN67 a legally mandatory standard?
PWTAG TN67 is guidance rather than legislation. However, the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 require duty holders to manage Legionella risk. TN67 and BS 8580 are recognised as the standard of care that courts and enforcers reference.
What happens if Legionella is detected above 1000 cfu/L?
Detection above 1000 cfu/L triggers immediate corrective action per BS 8580. This includes thermal or chemical shock treatment of the system, a full review of the risk assessment, investigation of potential biofilm harbourage points, enhanced monitoring with repeat sampling, and possible temporary closure of the feature until results are satisfactory.
What is the difference between PWTAG TN67 and BS 8580?
TN67 provides water quality targets and operational guidance specific to decorative water features (chlorine levels, pH, clarity, UV requirements). BS 8580 provides the broader Legionella risk assessment methodology (aerosol risk, biofilm evaluation, temperature profiling, management audit). A complete water feature inspection combines both frameworks.
Digitize your PWTAG TN67 inspections
Replace paper forms and spreadsheets with structured digital inspections — built for standards like PWTAG TN67.
Free 14-day trial. No credit card required.